[PDB-gov] Voting eligibility

[Owen DeLong]

> On Nov 18, 2015, at 14:36 , bill manning <azuremesa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> thought experiment:
> an entity has one or more ASNs assigned, either through an RIR or from private ASN space.
> Each ASN represents a unique Peering Policy (thats what ASNs do).
> 
> Posit one vote per policy or vote per ASN.
> 
> In the event that an entity has multiple ASNs/policies, all represented by the same natural person, it would seem prudent to restrict the natural person to a single vote, regardless of the number of ASNs they represent.
> 
> Are you suggesting that instead of the natural/legal entity distinction, that a better way would be to have a single vote per registered entity regardless of the number of ASNs/policies registered in peeringDB?
> 
> Think that might work.
> 

I think it’s more about not disenfranchising entities that do not have an ASN such as some IXs.

I would also like to see us avoid disenfranchising participating and active individuals who are not
representative of an ORG.

Owen


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/pdb-gov/attachments/20151118/1a19f822/attachment.html>