<html><head></head><body><div>I've put my money where my mouth is and begun working on the arrangements with Chris to pay for it.<br /><br /><div class="acompli_signature"></div><br /></div><br /><br /><br />
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 6:30 AM -0800, "James Bensley" <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jwbensley@gmail.com" target="_blank">jwbensley@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="3D"ltr"">
<pre>On 6 November 2015 at 22:30, Brandon Butterworth <brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>> call it what you want or what you dont want. its a conflict.
>>
>> my opinion is a third party be used as well
>>
>> On 6 November 2015 at 14:44, Brad Raymo <brad.raymo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I do not think trustworthiness is being called into question. I agree a
>> > neutral 3rd party would be wise.
>
> Yes, don't want it going icann on us
>
> brandon
> _______________________________________________
> Pdb-gov mailing list
> Pdb-gov@lists.peeringdb.com
> http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-gov
Here here.
How will BigPulse sounds like the ideal way forward, that way in the
future the voting can not be doubted. How can it be funded though?
Cheers,
James.
_______________________________________________
Pdb-gov mailing list
Pdb-gov@lists.peeringdb.com
http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-gov
</brad.raymo@gmail.com></brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk></pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body></html>