<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Nov 18, 2015, at 15:12 , Dave Temkin <<a href="mailto:dave@temk.in" class="">dave@temk.in</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><br class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Chris Caputo <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:secretary@peeringdb.com" target="_blank" class="">secretary@peeringdb.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br class="">
I think low-cost ($5?) annual fee-based individual memberships are an<br class="">
interesting solution to what started this thread, assuming you mean in<br class="">
addition to organizational members. Folks could pay the fee for others,<br class="">
as a way of supporting their volunteering.<br class=""></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Sounds like a great way to electioneer - cheap votes! </div></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">Given that the sale would be limited to one per natural person and that these</div><div class="">natural persons would be ineligible if they are affiliated with an existing member</div><div class="">ORG, I think the electioneering potential is rather limited.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Are you expecting the domainers to want to take over peeringdb for some reason?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Owen</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>