<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Nov 18, 2015, at 14:36 , bill manning <<a href="mailto:azuremesa@gmail.com" class="">azuremesa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">thought experiment:</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">an entity has one or more ASNs assigned, either through an RIR or from private ASN space.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">Each ASN represents a unique Peering Policy (thats what ASNs do).</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">Posit one vote per policy or vote per ASN.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">In the event that an entity has multiple ASNs/policies, all represented by the same natural person, it would seem prudent to restrict the natural person to a single vote, regardless of the number of ASNs they represent.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">Are you suggesting that instead of the natural/legal entity distinction, that a better way would be to have a single vote per registered entity regardless of the number of ASNs/policies registered in peeringDB?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">Think that might work.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large"><br class=""></div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>I think it’s more about not disenfranchising entities that do not have an ASN such as some IXs.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>I would also like to see us avoid disenfranchising participating and active individuals who are not</div><div>representative of an ORG.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Owen</div><div><br class=""></div><br class=""></body></html>