<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Route servers are not a requirement hence no ASN needed.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Best,</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">-M<</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On Nov 18, 2015, at 5:48 PM, bill manning <<a href="mailto:azuremesa@gmail.com" class="">azuremesa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
Hum.. so an IIX w/o an ASN has a vested interest in peering? How does that work?</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
<br class="">
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
wrt "interested parties"...</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
<br class="">
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
Does this sound much different that stock classes & voting your "A" shares differently than your "B" shares?</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
<br class="">
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
/Wm</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br class="">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Owen DeLong <span dir="ltr" class="">
<<a href="mailto:owen@delong.com" target="_blank" class="">owen@delong.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class="">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word" class=""><span class=""><br class="">
<div class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On Nov 18, 2015, at 14:36 , bill manning <<a href="mailto:azuremesa@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="">azuremesa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="">
<div class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
thought experiment:</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
an entity has one or more ASNs assigned, either through an RIR or from private ASN space.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
Each ASN represents a unique Peering Policy (thats what ASNs do).</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
<br class="">
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
Posit one vote per policy or vote per ASN.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
<br class="">
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
In the event that an entity has multiple ASNs/policies, all represented by the same natural person, it would seem prudent to restrict the natural person to a single vote, regardless of the number of ASNs they represent.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
<br class="">
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
Are you suggesting that instead of the natural/legal entity distinction, that a better way would be to have a single vote per registered entity regardless of the number of ASNs/policies registered in peeringDB?</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
<br class="">
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
Think that might work.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:large">
<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
</div>
</span>
<div class="">I think it’s more about not disenfranchising entities that do not have an ASN such as some IXs.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">I would also like to see us avoid disenfranchising participating and active individuals who are not</div>
<div class="">representative of an ORG.</div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888" class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Owen</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<br class="">
</font></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">
Pdb-gov mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:Pdb-gov@lists.peeringdb.com" class="">Pdb-gov@lists.peeringdb.com</a><br class="">
http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-gov<br class="">
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</body>
</html>