[PDB Data Ownership-TF] Apricot 2020

Tue Feb 4 13:07:15 PST 2020

Terry, 

I just heard that Job will not be able to attend APRICOT anymore. 
This makes us down to 3, who will be in Melbourne in person, to my count.

I've checked the timezones again and it does not look realistic to me that we can have majority or any critical mass attending an online meeting during any reasonable day-time hr meeting in MEL. See a sample at https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20200219&p1=16&p2=152&p3=64&p4=43 <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20200219&p1=16&p2=152&p3=64&p4=43>

So I would say it is best that you, I and Arnold meet in person while we are in APRICOT. 
We can then follow-up on the mailing list as necessary after our meeting and our discussion points can be shared with the other TF members.
After APRICOT week, we can follow-up with an online mtg as usual. 

I will send an off-list mail to arrange a meeting time in MEL. 

Kind regards
Filiz

> On 3 Feb 2020, at 21:18, Terry Sweetser <Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au> wrote:
> 
> Let’s narrow down a possible time to Wednesday 19th after lunch or some time on Thursday 20th in M10, the Peering Meet Me room.
>  
> Regards,
> Terry Sweetser
> General Manager, IX Australia
> Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au <mailto:tim at ix.asn.au>
> Mobile/WhatsApp: +61455067119
> <image001.jpg>
>  
>  
> From: Filiz Yilmaz <filiz at peeringdb.com> 
> Sent: Monday, 3 February 2020 11:16 PM
> To: Terry Sweetser <Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au>
> Cc: dataownership-tf at lists.peeringdb.com
> Subject: Re: [PDB Data Ownership-TF] Apricot 2020
>  
> Hi Terry, 
>  
> Any news on this?
> Pls note I am on leave from 7 Feb onwards until 17 Feb (1st day of APRICOT).
> It will be best to conclude this before Thursday this week. 
>  
> Regards
> Filiz
>  
>  
> On 30 Jan 2020, at 15:14, Filiz Yilmaz <filiz at peeringdb.com <mailto:filiz at peeringdb.com>> wrote:
>  
> Hi Terry,
>  
> Will you be able to get us a room for any time we can? 
> If so I can open a Doodle to find the right time for the majority? 
>  
> Otherwise, pls advise on the date and times of the room availability and I will open a Doodle considering them. 
>  
> Filiz
> 
> 
> On 29 Jan 2020, at 23:37, Terry Sweetser <Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au <mailto:Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au>> wrote:
>  
> Hi Filiz, very easy to arrange, my team is doing all the telco work.
> Have we got a proposed time and date for this meeting yet?
>  
> Regards,
> Terry Sweetser
> General Manager, IX Australia
> Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au <mailto:tim at ix.asn.au>
> Mobile/WhatsApp: +61455067119
> <image001.jpg>
>  
>  
> From: Filiz Yilmaz <filiz at peeringdb.com <mailto:filiz at peeringdb.com>> 
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2020 10:48 PM
> To: Terry Sweetser <Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au <mailto:Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au>>
> Cc: dataownership-tf at lists.peeringdb.com <mailto:dataownership-tf at lists.peeringdb.com>
> Subject: Re: [PDB Data Ownership-TF] Apricot 2020
>  
> Hi Terry,
>  
> I have not received further feedback on this but we did talk about it during the last TF meeting. 
>  
> If we can arrange a place to meet during APRICOT can we make sure it will have connectivity too? 
> This way we can open Goto meetings and provide the opportunity for others to join in too, assuming the time will be manageable for them. 
>  
> If no one can attend we can still have a discussion and reflect those on the mailing list for other to follow-up later on. 
>  
> Pls let me know which date/time the room can be made available so I will schedule a Goto meeting.
>  
>  
> Kind regards
> Filiz
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> On 9 Jan 2020, at 17:21, Filiz Yilmaz <filiz at peeringdb.com <mailto:filiz at peeringdb.com>> wrote:
>  
> Hi Terry,
>  
> Thank you for your offer. I will be there and I will be very happy to meet you and others in person as I am there. 
> Nothing beats a face-to-face when especially discussing conflicting views :). 
>  
> Having said that I think we should be mindful about setting the ground rules for such a meeting. 
> We are geographically diverse and we have so far adapted having online meetings where the date and time set each time based on a Doodle poll. 
> I am worried a face to face meeting at APRICOT may result in not having majority of the group present and not being able to follow or participate in the discussions.
>  
> Due to time difference challenges, we may not be able to conduct such an online meeting for others to join in, whilst some (or worse only few) of us meet in person during APRICOT. Accordingly, I would suggest if that happens to be the case, we only have an informal meeting during APRICOT. 
> We can discuss issues and come up with suggestions for the rest of the TF to consider, but no decisions are to be taken during that meeting, if we are to lack a critical mass of participants. 
>  
> Would this work for everyone? 
> Thoughts? 
>  
> Kind regards
> Filiz
>  
> 
> 
> 
> On 8 Jan 2020, at 00:19, Terry Sweetser <Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au <mailto:Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au>> wrote:
>  
> Hi Taskforce,
> If you’re coming to Apricot 2020 in Melbourne, I suggest we have a get-together in person at the event.  I can organise a space for a meeting.
> Ref: https://2020.apricot.net/ <https://2020.apricot.net/>
> Regards,
> Terry Sweetser
> General Manager, IX Australia
> Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au <mailto:tim at ix.asn.au>
> Mobile/WhatsApp: +61455067119
> <image003.jpg>
>  
>  
> -- 
> DataOwnership-TF mailing list
> DataOwnership-TF at lists.peeringdb.com <mailto:DataOwnership-TF at lists.peeringdb.com>
> https://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dataownership-tf <https://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dataownership-tf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/dataownership-tf/attachments/20200204/0e04a4b7/attachment-0001.htm>