[PDB Data Ownership-TF] Last Call: IXP assignment IP address (netixlan) ownership

[Chris Caputo]

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020, Chris Caputo wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020, Chris Caputo wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> > > On 29.01.2020 04:33, Chris Caputo wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, William Marantz wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:27 AM Arnold Nipper <arnold at peeringdb.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Now it starts to make sense to me as well. If you could also take 
> > > > > > #539 into account we should have a made a huge step forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > I support that "already published" modification to your proposal 
> > > > > Chris. I totally forgot about that use case and great idea.
> > > > 
> > > > Excellent!  Ok, I spent a bunch of time today trying to pull #539, 
> > > > #585, and #627 together in some coherent way.  Please review the below 
> > > > and let me know of mistakes.  Maybe we can beat this around into 
> > > > something useful.
> > > 
> > > Looks very elaborated to me, Chris. Very well done! Thank you for your 
> > > time and effort. I don't have the time to go through the pseudocode in 
> > > detail, but I didn't find obvious flaws.
> > > 
> > > How to proceed? Open a new issue with the pseudocode? As this is very 
> > > well specced out it could be implemented right away. I would love to see 
> > > it happening with the next release!
> > 
> > Thank you for your support.  I do think this would be ambitious for the 
> > next release as I expect it to involve some considerable dev time.
> > 
> > I think the next step is to have others on the task force chime in.  If we 
> > can get the pseudocode approved by the task force that will be a giant 
> > step forward.  I'll then make a new GitHub issue announcing task force 
> > support and encourage the Product Committee to approve it.
> > 
> > Tally so far:  (please correct or add yourself as appropriate or reach out 
> > to me directly and I'll track the votes/revisions)
> [...]
> > 
> > PS: I've attached the pseudocode as a .c file in case anyone wants to view 
> > it in an editor with syntax highlighting, or make edits.  I find that 
> > really helps with clarity.  Diffs welcome!
> 
> Update...
> 
> For:
>  - Chris Caputo
>  - Arnold Nipper
>  - William Marantz
>  - Patrick Gilmore
>  - Terry Sweetser
>  - Darrell Budic
> 
> Against:
>  -
> 
> Abstain:
>  -
> 
> Please make time this week, such as before the Thursday call, to review 
> and consider letting me know if you support.

In the conference today it was decided to make the "last call" for this be 
February 13th.  Please speak up before then about any objections.

Thanks!

Chris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pdb_pseudocode_539_585_627.c
Type: text/x-c
Size: 10906 bytes
Desc: 
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/dataownership-tf/attachments/20200206/116f9686/attachment.bin>