[PDB Data Ownership-TF] Data Ownership Task Force Meeting#6

Filiz Yilmaz filiz at peeringdb.com
Mon Jan 20 04:28:51 PST 2020


Dear all,


There were unfortunately only 4 responses to the Doodle. 
I am hoping there will be more participation to the meeting on the day it is scheduled, which is Jan 23 THU 17:00 - 18:00 CET. 

If you are finding meeting attendance difficult for any reason, please let me know and we can look for a solution. 

In the meanwhile, pls note the latest discussions and actions for follow-ups from the last meeting below. 

Hope to talk to you on Thursday. Meeting invites are sent and agenda will follow later. 

Kind regards
Filiz Yilmaz



> ----------------------------------
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Filiz Yilmaz <filiz at peeringdb.com>
> Subject: Meeting#5 Follow-up
> Date: 10 January 2020 at 17:03:46 CET
> To: dataownership-tf at lists.peeringdb.com
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> We had our 5th Meeting on 7 Jan 2020, Tuesday. 
> 
> Below you can find information about this meeting, the actions and pointers for further follow-up:
> 
> 
> Agendas, the high-level notes and the recordings of the meetings are all in the shared folder (https://drive.google.com/drive/u/2/folders/1wz08_g6NtqkiBkOYUhekLwVJYwZkCnBv <https://drive.google.com/drive/u/2/folders/1wz08_g6NtqkiBkOYUhekLwVJYwZkCnBv>).
>  
> 
> Highlights of the meeting were:
> 
> Recent change on the Scope <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1su38Vko9_3-aoo_LYvKckbK6PNVTwfLgzbYQBN3bv7c/edit>'s wording is reflected now on https://docs.peeringdb.com/taskforce/dataownership/ <https://docs.peeringdb.com/taskforce/dataownership/>
> Policy Document <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wVqWwmQpYu5L-2lhvLeu0VHOTWCw8dJMEOrw8Cg5DBk/edit#heading=h.mnvwhx5r2153>:
> Discussion took place on the Overarching Principles section again. The text you see on the current document are just notes and referrals. The wording will be improved based on them. 
> Lengthy discussion took place on description of an IX. Eventually group decided that a description should be avoided, or a referral to the IXDB definition should be made. 
> In light of information received from Stefan Funke in regards to Admin Committee Practices, TF further discussed Virtual networks, IXPs and issues for Facilities again. Main discussion point during this meeting was having disputes and especially how Facilities may be dealing with that and accordingly how PeeringDB could deal with these situations. 
> Action on ALL: Listen to the recording of the meeting.
> Action on ALL: Follow-up and contribute to the discussions that started with mails from Chris Caputo since 7 January. These discussions are the heart of the TF's scope and commitment. 
> Next meeting:
> Meeting #6 will be scheduled to take place during 21-31 Jan period. 
> Action on Filiz: Doddle next meeting
> 
> If you have any questions, please let me know.
> 
> Kind regards
> Filiz

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/dataownership-tf/attachments/20200120/4eb96637/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the DataOwnership-TF mailing list