[PDB Data Ownership-TF] draft "Data Ownership Policy Document"

[Darrell Budic]

One nit pick:

3.2:

 - Data is expected to be consistent and correct following good 
   engineering.
should probably be
 - Data is expected to be consistent and correct following good 
   engineering practices.

and one question. In 6.1, "Similarly, conflicted data which has not been published shall not be”. How can this occur? Is there an example someone can provide? Does peeringdb delay the publishing of new data in such a way as multiple entries could be made before publishing, causing such an unpublished conflict?

  -Darrell

> On Mar 12, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Chris Caputo <ccaputo at alt.net> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, Arnold Nipper wrote:
>> On 04.03.2020 02:45, Arnold Nipper wrote:
>>> On 04.03.2020 00:56, Chris Caputo wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Absolutely and thank you.
>>>> 
>>>> Chris
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, Terry Sweetser wrote:
>>>>> I've like to give some time on the weekend, so please bear with me until next week.
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> What about having a fixed cut-off date. Would 2020-03-20 work for everyone?
>> 
>> Short reminder ... so far I've only seen a comment from Bill.
> 
> Hi Arnold.  Terry also expressed support:
> 
> --
>  Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 00:47:09 +0000
>  From: Terry Sweetser <Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au <mailto:Terry.Sweetser at ix.asn.au>>
>  To: Chris Caputo <ccaputo at alt.net <mailto:ccaputo at alt.net>>
>  Cc: DTF PeeringDB <dataownership-tf at lists.peeringdb.com <mailto:dataownership-tf at lists.peeringdb.com>>
>  Subject: RE: [PDB Data Ownership-TF] draft "Data Ownership Policy Document"
> 
>  Hi Chris,
> 
>  It looks good, very good.
> --
> 
> and I updated the latest draft at:
> 
>  https://www.caputo.com/dotf/ <https://www.caputo.com/dotf/>
> 
> to indicate his support.  The current draft:
> 
>  https://www.caputo.com/dotf/0.20200307.1-CC-AN-WM-TS.txt <https://www.caputo.com/dotf/0.20200307.1-CC-AN-WM-TS.txt>
> 
> is supported by:
> 
>  Chris Caputo
>  Arnold Nipper
>  William Marantz
>  Terry Sweetser
> 
> I encourage others to give it a review.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
> -- 
> DataOwnership-TF mailing list
> DataOwnership-TF at lists.peeringdb.com <mailto:DataOwnership-TF at lists.peeringdb.com>
> https://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dataownership-tf <https://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dataownership-tf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/dataownership-tf/attachments/20200315/f234885d/attachment-0001.htm>