[PDB Data Ownership-TF] draft "Data Ownership Policy Document" (fwd)
ccaputo at alt.net
Sat Mar 21 13:18:18 PDT 2020
Job's email got filtered by the list software. I have now made it so
future emails from his @instituut.net address should make it through.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 20:30:38 +0100
From: Job Snijders <job at instituut.net>
To: Chris Caputo <ccaputo at alt.net>
Cc: DTF PeeringDB <dataownership-tf at lists.peeringdb.com>
Subject: Re: [PDB Data Ownership-TF] draft "Data Ownership Policy Document"
Yes, that covers everything.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 8:28 PM Chris Caputo <ccaputo at alt.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, Job Snijders wrote:
> > Dear group,
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 06:35:32PM +0000, Chris Caputo wrote:
> > > https://www.caputo.com/dotf/0.20200320.2-CC-AN-WM-DB.txt
> > I've just now read the whole document and I am very impressed with how
> > this is shaping up. I recognise a lot of what was discussed in our calls
> > and believe this draft would be an excellent output of this effort.
> > My only suggestion is that perhaps it should be documented that should
> > dispute arise as a result of the Admin Committee's resolution process,
> > the issue is brought to PeeringDB's Board of Directors for mediation.
> I could see this as an additional paragraph in section 3.3 "Admin
> Committee" ala:
> - Decisions of the Admin Committee may be appealed to the PeeringDB
> Board of Directors.
> Would that work for you?
More information about the DataOwnership-TF