[PDB-gov] Vote collection and counting

James Bensley jwbensley at gmail.com
Sat Nov 7 06:29:42 PST 2015

On 6 November 2015 at 22:30, Brandon Butterworth <brandon at rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>> call it what you want or what you dont want. its a conflict.
>> my opinion is a third party be used as well
>> On 6 November 2015 at 14:44, Brad Raymo <brad.raymo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I do not think trustworthiness is being called into question. I agree a
>> > neutral 3rd party would be  wise.
> Yes, don't want it going icann on us
> brandon
> _______________________________________________
> Pdb-gov mailing list
> Pdb-gov at lists.peeringdb.com
> http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-gov

Here here.

How will BigPulse sounds like the ideal way forward, that way in the
future the voting can not be doubted. How can it be funded though?


More information about the Pdb-gov mailing list