[PDB-tech] Netnod Stockholm LANs same IX

[Martin J. Levy]

+1 

This could not be handled by PDB1.0 cleanly however 2.0 can handle it. Same for some otter IXs like this.

How do we update the DB to add data to the MTUs and/or VLAN numbers columns and more? Should NETNOD request this?

Martin

PS: Jumbo Frames for the win! 

> On Apr 14, 2016, at 1:42 PM, Paul Vlaar <pvlaar at afilias.info> wrote:
> 
> I am wondering why Netnod Stockholm is listed as one IX in peeringdb_ix, when in fact it has 2 LANs. LINX also has 2 LANs and these are both listed as a separate IX:
> 
> mysql> select id, name, name_long from peeringdb_ix where name like '%linx%lan';
> +-----+------------------+-------------------------------+
> | id  | name             | name_long                     |
> +-----+------------------+-------------------------------+
> |  18 | LINX Juniper LAN | London Internet Exchange Ltd. |
> | 321 | LINX Extreme LAN | London Internet Exchange Ltd. |
> +-----+------------------+-------------------------------+
> 
> mysql> select id, name, name_long from peeringdb_ix where name like '%netnod stockholm%';
> +----+------------------+---------------------------------------+
> | id | name             | name_long                             |
> +----+------------------+---------------------------------------+
> | 70 | Netnod Stockholm | Netnod Internet Exchange i Sverige AB |
> +----+------------------+---------------------------------------+
> 
> Since recently we have been connected to Netnod and have an IP address on both STH-A and STH-B. Now, some code I have written expects for each LAN to be associated to a separate IX entity as per the PeeringDB database. Perhaps that is a wrong assumption, but I'm just trying to figure out the logic why LINX has that split and Netnod Stockholm has not.
> 
>    ~paul
> _______________________________________________
> Pdb-tech mailing list
> Pdb-tech at lists.peeringdb.com
> http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-tech