[PDB-tech] Netnod Stockholm LANs same IX

[Mark Tinka]

On 17/Apr/16 17:36, Arnold Nipper wrote:

> Basically I fully agree, Martin. I guess one of the main purposes of
> PDB2.0 also is/was to ease automation. Hence you have to be able to
> easily and automagically retrieve information for e.g. about members,
> peerings etc.
>
> And before we start the discussion we all should be clear what we mean
> by "LAN" or "IXP".
>
> I guess the model has to go along
>
>  org -> "independant physical infrastructure" -> vlan (-> prefixe(s))
>
> Each unique instantion of this triple (or maybe quadruple) would imho be
> what would be an IXP.

I agree - in the cases where VLAN's are applicable (in the Netnod case)
or just infrastructure (in the LINX case).

Mark.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/pdb-tech/attachments/20160417/6854430d/attachment.sig>