[PDB-tech] Netnod Stockholm LANs same IX

[Arnold Nipper]

On 17.04.2016 18:46, Job Snijders wrote:

>>> In the PeeringDB integrations I've done I've always targetted the
>>> code to search for IPs that are in the same subnet as I am (which
>>> means a peering could be established). The properties are then
>>> evaluated against the local policy (for instance, inter-domain
>>> multicast peering not supported => no multicast peering). What
>>> remains can be configured.
>>> 
>> 
>> Regarding same subnet: are there IXP that use *different* subnet
>> on the same vlan forming a single peering fabric (not asking why
>> you would do so)
> 
> That's fine, from a programmatic perspective they would be different 
> IXPs. If I have configured only one of the subnets but not the other,
> I cannot reach the other, so for all intends and purposes its as if
> the second subnet is on a different IXP.
> 

Well, iirc if you configure the other network as "connected" you would
also be able to reach the other network. So it would be the same IXP ...

And a more philosophical question: after re-numbering is it a
*different* IXP?


Arnold
-- 
Arnold Nipper
Chief Technology Evangelist and Co-Founder

DE-CIX Management GmbH | Lindleystrasse 12 | 60314 Frankfurt am Main |
Germany | www.de-cix.net | Phone +49 69 1730902 22 |
Mobile +49 172 2650958 | Fax +49 69 4056 2716 |
arnold.nipper at de-cix.net | Geschaeftsfuehrer Harald A. Summa |
Registergericht AG Koeln HRB 51135

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/pdb-tech/attachments/20160417/c497b42d/attachment.sig>