[PDB-tech] facility lat/long

[Matt Griswold]

* Nick Harland <nharland at microsoft.com> [160218 23:08 +0000]:
> Maybe this has come up before and been shot down for good reason, but
> why not have a lat/long field for facility records?
> 
> It's nice to be able to place things on a map, and relying on the
> facility address and geocoding only gets me ~70% of sites placed
> close to where they should be.
It wasn't shot down, it's just pushed until post 2.0 release.