[PDB User] "ipv4 prefixes" / "ipv6 prefixes" semantics

[Phillip Baker]

-----Original Message-----
From: User-discuss [mailto:user-discuss-bounces at lists.peeringdb.com] On Behalf Of Job Snijders
Sent: 02 August 2017 10:53
To: user-discuss at lists.peeringdb.com
Subject: Re: [PDB User] "ipv4 prefixes" / "ipv6 prefixes" semantics

> I'd like it to mean "This is what NTT generally recommends as the maximum prefix limit on EBGP sessions where you expect NTT to announce their customer cone", so that the listed values can be used verbatim in provisioning systems.

Wait, isn't that what everyone takes it to mean, except perhaps in the case of the smallest networks that might actually set their record to "2" or something (and presumably you'd have a floor value anyway in your automation to avoid micromanagement?)

Phil