[PDB Data Ownership-TF] Meeting#7 Follow-up
arnold at peeringdb.com
Fri Feb 7 14:43:52 PST 2020
On 07.02.2020 18:31, Christopher Malayter wrote:
> I believe that needs to be fixed.
* that facility owners don't need to have an admin? (hint: SUGGEST feature)
* what Filiz wrote based on my comments
>> On Feb 7, 2020, at 6:28 AM, Arnold Nipper <arnold at nipper.de> wrote:
>> On 06.02.2020 20:32, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
>>> * Facilities section should note that some of the data in PeeringDB
>>> are not owned and we do not expect it to be owned anytime soon.
>>> * Resolving conflicts on Facilities is also in Admin Committee’s
>>> domain too but this can be limited as Facilities can be orphaned.
>> To be precise. Facility objects also are always owned by an
>> organisation. However, this organisation does not have to have any user
>> affiliated to it. Let alone an admin.
>> Arnold Nipper
>> email: arnold at nipper.de
>> mobile: +49 172 2650958
>> DataOwnership-TF mailing list
>> DataOwnership-TF at lists.peeringdb.com
email: arnold at peeringdb.com
mobile: +49 172 2650958
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the DataOwnership-TF