[PDB Data Ownership-TF] Meeting#7 Follow-up

[Arnold Nipper]

Chris

On 07.02.2020 18:31, Christopher Malayter wrote:

> I believe that needs to be fixed.
> 

what exactly?

 * that facility owners don't need to have an admin? (hint: SUGGEST feature)

 * what Filiz wrote based on my comments


Cheers
Arnold

>> On Feb 7, 2020, at 6:28 AM, Arnold Nipper <arnold at nipper.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 06.02.2020 20:32, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
>>
>>>  * Facilities section should note that some of the data in PeeringDB
>>>    are not owned and we do not expect it to be owned anytime soon.
>>>  * Resolving conflicts on Facilities is also in Admin Committee’s
>>>    domain too but this can be limited as Facilities can be orphaned.
>>>
>>
>> To be precise. Facility objects also are always owned by an
>> organisation. However, this organisation does not have to have any user
>> affiliated to it. Let alone an admin.
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>> Arnold
>> -- 
>> Arnold Nipper
>> email: arnold at nipper.de
>> mobile: +49 172 2650958
>>
>> -- 
>> DataOwnership-TF mailing list
>> DataOwnership-TF at lists.peeringdb.com
>> https://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dataownership-tf
> 


-- 
Arnold Nipper
email: arnold at peeringdb.com
mobile: +49 172 2650958

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/dataownership-tf/attachments/20200207/423067c5/attachment.sig>