[PDB Data Ownership-TF] Meeting#7 Follow-up

[Christopher Malayter]

Arnold,

This is the Data Ownership Taskforce correct?

I’m suggesting we allow facility admins.

Seems to be within the charter of the Taskforce.

-Chris


> On Feb 7, 2020, at 5:43 PM, Arnold Nipper <arnold at peeringdb.com> wrote:
> 
> Chris
> 
> On 07.02.2020 18:31, Christopher Malayter wrote:
> 
>> I believe that needs to be fixed.
>> 
> 
> what exactly?
> 
> * that facility owners don't need to have an admin? (hint: SUGGEST feature)
> 
> * what Filiz wrote based on my comments
> 
> 
> Cheers
> Arnold
> 
>>> On Feb 7, 2020, at 6:28 AM, Arnold Nipper <arnold at nipper.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 06.02.2020 20:32, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
>>> 
>>>> * Facilities section should note that some of the data in PeeringDB
>>>>   are not owned and we do not expect it to be owned anytime soon.
>>>> * Resolving conflicts on Facilities is also in Admin Committee’s
>>>>   domain too but this can be limited as Facilities can be orphaned.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> To be precise. Facility objects also are always owned by an
>>> organisation. However, this organisation does not have to have any user
>>> affiliated to it. Let alone an admin.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Arnold
>>> -- 
>>> Arnold Nipper
>>> email: arnold at nipper.de
>>> mobile: +49 172 2650958
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> DataOwnership-TF mailing list
>>> DataOwnership-TF at lists.peeringdb.com
>>> https://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dataownership-tf
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Arnold Nipper
> email: arnold at peeringdb.com <mailto:arnold at peeringdb.com>
> mobile: +49 172 2650958

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/dataownership-tf/attachments/20200207/e817bc3e/attachment-0001.htm>