[PDB Data Ownership-TF] Meeting#7 Follow-up
mustang at terahertz.net
Fri Feb 7 20:02:35 PST 2020
This is the Data Ownership Taskforce correct?
I’m suggesting we allow facility admins.
Seems to be within the charter of the Taskforce.
> On Feb 7, 2020, at 5:43 PM, Arnold Nipper <arnold at peeringdb.com> wrote:
> On 07.02.2020 18:31, Christopher Malayter wrote:
>> I believe that needs to be fixed.
> what exactly?
> * that facility owners don't need to have an admin? (hint: SUGGEST feature)
> * what Filiz wrote based on my comments
>>> On Feb 7, 2020, at 6:28 AM, Arnold Nipper <arnold at nipper.de> wrote:
>>> On 06.02.2020 20:32, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
>>>> * Facilities section should note that some of the data in PeeringDB
>>>> are not owned and we do not expect it to be owned anytime soon.
>>>> * Resolving conflicts on Facilities is also in Admin Committee’s
>>>> domain too but this can be limited as Facilities can be orphaned.
>>> To be precise. Facility objects also are always owned by an
>>> organisation. However, this organisation does not have to have any user
>>> affiliated to it. Let alone an admin.
>>> Arnold Nipper
>>> email: arnold at nipper.de
>>> mobile: +49 172 2650958
>>> DataOwnership-TF mailing list
>>> DataOwnership-TF at lists.peeringdb.com
> Arnold Nipper
> email: arnold at peeringdb.com <mailto:arnold at peeringdb.com>
> mobile: +49 172 2650958
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the DataOwnership-TF