[PDB Data Ownership-TF] Meeting#5 Follow-up
ccaputo at alt.net
Fri Jan 10 08:18:28 PST 2020
Thank you for everything Filiz.
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
> + Lengthy discussion took place on description of an IX.
> Eventually group decided that a description should be avoided, or
> a referral to the IXDB definition should be made.
All, I think we meant IX-F here:
but even with that we may decide it is best to both not define IXP and not
refer to a specific definition, or maybe refer to multiple along with
pointing out there is no perfect definition. I learned of:
(Remove Virtual IXPs #515)
and read there are significant differences of opinion about what an IXP is
defined as, along with other definitions from Open-IX and RIPE, etc.
Ie., the definition of IXP is a significant task in of itself, with
More information about the DataOwnership-TF