[PDB Data Ownership-TF] IXP assignment IP address (netixlan) ownership

[Chris Caputo]

On Wed, 29 Jan 2020, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> On 29.01.2020 04:33, Chris Caputo wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, William Marantz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:27 AM Arnold Nipper <arnold at peeringdb.com> wrote:
> > > > Now it starts to make sense to me as well. If you could also take 
> > > > #539 into account we should have a made a huge step forward.
> > >
> > > I support that "already published" modification to your proposal 
> > > Chris. I totally forgot about that use case and great idea.
> > 
> > Excellent!  Ok, I spent a bunch of time today trying to pull #539, 
> > #585, and #627 together in some coherent way.  Please review the below 
> > and let me know of mistakes.  Maybe we can beat this around into 
> > something useful.
> 
> Looks very elaborated to me, Chris. Very well done! Thank you for your 
> time and effort. I don't have the time to go through the pseudocode in 
> detail, but I didn't find obvious flaws.
> 
> How to proceed? Open a new issue with the pseudocode? As this is very 
> well specced out it could be implemented right away. I would love to see 
> it happening with the next release!

Thank you for your support.  I do think this would be ambitious for the 
next release as I expect it to involve some considerable dev time.

I think the next step is to have others on the task force chime in.  If we 
can get the pseudocode approved by the task force that will be a giant 
step forward.  I'll then make a new GitHub issue announcing task force 
support and encourage the Product Committee to approve it.

Tally so far:  (please correct or add yourself as appropriate or reach out 
to me directly and I'll track the votes/revisions)

For:
 - Chris Caputo
 - Arnold Nipper

Against:
 -

Abstain:
 -

Chris

PS: I've attached the pseudocode as a .c file in case anyone wants to view 
it in an editor with syntax highlighting, or make edits.  I find that 
really helps with clarity.  Diffs welcome!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pdb_pseudocode_539_585_627.c
Type: text/x-c
Size: 10906 bytes
Desc: 
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/dataownership-tf/attachments/20200129/d28dc3b6/attachment-0001.bin>