[PDB Data Ownership-TF] draft "Data Ownership Policy Document"

[Filiz Yilmaz]

I agree we need to provide a longer time for this.

I suggest we set a Review Phase until 20 March. 

After that date, depending on the nature of comments we may either extend the Review Phase or call for a Last Call to seal the document.

Kind regards

Filiz

>> On 4 Mar 2020, at 05:08, Chris Caputo <ccaputo at alt.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020, Arnold Nipper wrote:
>>> On 04.03.2020 00:56, Chris Caputo wrote:
>>> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, Terry Sweetser wrote:
>>>> I've like to give some time on the weekend, so please bear with me until next week.
>>> Absolutely and thank you.
>> 
>> What about having a fixed cut-off date. Would 2020-03-20 work for everyone?
> 
> To be courteous, I recommend we give task force members a good chance to 
> review and chime in over the course of the next week or two, as they are 
> able to.  We just gave everyone a fair sized document with a bunch of 
> changes to devour and there may be some questions and changes requested 
> along the way as it gets reviewed.  Or they might rejected it altogether.  
> :-)
> 
> If everyone loves it (my hope!) maybe we would be able to wrap it up close 
> to the original goal of about 6 months from September.
> 
> As an overview, here is what the outline of the draft looks like.
> 
> ---
> 
> 1) Background
> 
> 2) Scope
> 
> 3) Overarching Principles
> 
> 3.1) Purpose of PeeringDB
> 3.2) Expectations
> 3.3) Admin Committee
> 3.4) Conflicted Data
> 
> 4) User Interface Elements of PeeringDB
> 
> 4.1) Organizations
> 4.2) Facilities
> 4.3) Internet Exchanges
> 4.4) Networks 
> 4.5) Points of Contact
> 4.6) Public Peering Exchange Points
> 4.7) Private Peering Facilities
> 4.8) LAN
> 4.9) Prefixes
> 4.10) Local Facilities and Exchanges
> 
> 5) Data Elements in PeeringDB
> 
> 5.1) Single-party Data Elements
> 
> 5.1.1) as_set
> 5.1.2) fac
> 5.1.3) ix
> 5.1.4) ixlan
> 5.1.5) ixpfx
> 5.1.6) net
> 5.1.7) org
> 5.1.8) poc
> 
> 5.2) Multi-party Data Elements
> 
> 5.2.1) netixlan
> 5.2.2) ixfac
> 5.2.3) netfac
> 
> 6) Conflicted Data Resolution Recommendations
> 
> 6.1) netixlan
> 6.2) ixfac & netfac
> 
> 7) Action Items
> 
> 7.1) "netixlan" dependency on "ix", "ixlan", and "ixpfx"
> 7.2) "ixfac" and "netfac" dependency on "fac"
> 
> ---
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
> -- 
> DataOwnership-TF mailing list
> DataOwnership-TF at lists.peeringdb.com
> https://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dataownership-tf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/dataownership-tf/attachments/20200304/42282e4e/attachment.htm>