[PDB Data Ownership-TF] draft "Data Ownership Policy Document"
Arnold Nipper
arnold at nipper.de
Sat Mar 21 16:26:36 PDT 2020
On 21.03.2020 21:22, Chris Caputo wrote:
> Arnold brings up a good point. This task force can't really amend the
> Admin Committee charter which was already approved by the Board:
>
> https://docs.peeringdb.com/committee/admin/
>
> So instead of adding this to section 3.3 Admin Committee:
>
> - Decisions of the Admin Committee may be appealed to the PeeringDB
> Board of Directors.
>
> it may be much better to add: (diff below)
>
> - This Task Force recommends that the Admin Committee charter be amended
> to specify that decisions of the Admin Committee may be appealed to
> the PeeringDB Board of Directors.
>
Actually how the dispute resolution is implemented should be left to the
AC/Board to agree upon. Simply
- This Task Force recommends that the Admin Committee charter be
amended by a dispute resolution procedure.
Does that make sense?
Cheers
Arnold
--
Arnold Nipper
email: arnold at nipper.de
mobile: +49 172 2650958
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/dataownership-tf/attachments/20200322/19e8447b/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the DataOwnership-TF
mailing list