[PDB Data Ownership-TF] draft "Data Ownership Policy Document"

Arnold Nipper arnold at nipper.de
Sat Mar 21 16:26:36 PDT 2020


On 21.03.2020 21:22, Chris Caputo wrote:

> Arnold brings up a good point.  This task force can't really amend the 
> Admin Committee charter which was already approved by the Board:
> 
>   https://docs.peeringdb.com/committee/admin/
> 
> So instead of adding this to section 3.3 Admin Committee:
> 
>   - Decisions of the Admin Committee may be appealed to the PeeringDB 
>     Board of Directors.
> 
> it may be much better to add: (diff below)
> 
>   - This Task Force recommends that the Admin Committee charter be amended 
>     to specify that decisions of the Admin Committee may be appealed to 
>     the PeeringDB Board of Directors.
> 

Actually how the dispute resolution is implemented should be left to the
AC/Board to agree upon. Simply

  - This Task Force recommends that the Admin Committee charter be
    amended by a dispute resolution procedure.

Does that make sense?


Cheers
Arnold
-- 
Arnold Nipper
email: arnold at nipper.de
mobile: +49 172 2650958

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/dataownership-tf/attachments/20200322/19e8447b/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the DataOwnership-TF mailing list