[PDB Data Ownership-TF] draft "Data Ownership Policy Document"
ccaputo at alt.net
Sat Mar 21 16:37:09 PDT 2020
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> On 21.03.2020 21:22, Chris Caputo wrote:
> > Arnold brings up a good point. This task force can't really amend the
> > Admin Committee charter which was already approved by the Board:
> > https://docs.peeringdb.com/committee/admin/
> > So instead of adding this to section 3.3 Admin Committee:
> > - Decisions of the Admin Committee may be appealed to the PeeringDB
> > Board of Directors.
> > it may be much better to add: (diff below)
> > - This Task Force recommends that the Admin Committee charter be amended
> > to specify that decisions of the Admin Committee may be appealed to
> > the PeeringDB Board of Directors.
> Actually how the dispute resolution is implemented should be left to the
> AC/Board to agree upon. Simply
> - This Task Force recommends that the Admin Committee charter be
> amended by a dispute resolution procedure.
> Does that make sense?
- "My only suggestion is that perhaps it should be documented that
should dispute arise as a result of the Admin Committee's resolution
process, the issue is brought to PeeringDB's Board of Directors for
My sense of Job's concern is not how the Admin Committee resolves a
dispute, but rather how an appeal of an Admin Committee resolution
would be handled.
Arnold, would this work for you:
- This Task Force recommends that the Admin Committee charter be amended
to include a dispute resolution procedure which includes a process for
appeal to the Board of Directors.
More information about the DataOwnership-TF