[PDB Data Ownership-TF] draft "Data Ownership Policy Document"

[Chris Caputo]

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> On 21.03.2020 21:22, Chris Caputo wrote:
> 
> > Arnold brings up a good point.  This task force can't really amend the 
> > Admin Committee charter which was already approved by the Board:
> > 
> >   https://docs.peeringdb.com/committee/admin/
> > 
> > So instead of adding this to section 3.3 Admin Committee:
> > 
> >   - Decisions of the Admin Committee may be appealed to the PeeringDB 
> >     Board of Directors.
> > 
> > it may be much better to add: (diff below)
> > 
> >   - This Task Force recommends that the Admin Committee charter be amended 
> >     to specify that decisions of the Admin Committee may be appealed to 
> >     the PeeringDB Board of Directors.
> > 
> 
> Actually how the dispute resolution is implemented should be left to the
> AC/Board to agree upon. Simply
> 
>   - This Task Force recommends that the Admin Committee charter be
>     amended by a dispute resolution procedure.
> 
> Does that make sense?

Job wrote:

   - "My only suggestion is that perhaps it should be documented that 
     should dispute arise as a result of the Admin Committee's resolution 
     process, the issue is brought to PeeringDB's Board of Directors for 
     mediation."

My sense of Job's concern is not how the Admin Committee resolves a 
dispute, but rather how an appeal of an Admin Committee resolution 
would be handled.

Job?

Arnold, would this work for you:

  - This Task Force recommends that the Admin Committee charter be amended 
    to include a dispute resolution procedure which includes a process for
    appeal to the Board of Directors.

?

Chris