[PDB-gov] Results of Election of PeeringDB Initial Board of Directors
steven.feldman at cbsinteractive.com
Tue Dec 1 09:59:36 PST 2015
My logic was that since the Bylaws are silent on the issue, we should punt
the decision to the new Board. The results can be released if and when
they instruct us to do so, but releasing them now would take the decision
out of their hands.
That said, having been a candidate in similar elections in the past, I
would prefer to know the results to help me decide whether it's worth the
effort to try again.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Chris Caputo <secretary at peeringdb.com>
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, James Blessing wrote:
> > On 01/12/2015, 02:15, Chris Caputo <secretary at peeringdb.com> wrote:
> > >87 organizations were registered to vote. Of that, 86 ballots were
> > >
> > >Steve and I agree it does not serve a purpose to reveal the ranking.
> > Hi Chris,
> > It’s usually good practise to always post the full results so that if
> > things are ever questioned then there is a historical precedence of
> > transparency.
> > As this election was STV then the order of eliminations and elections is
> > more important than the “ranking"
> How do others feel about this?
> Pdb-gov mailing list
> Pdb-gov at lists.peeringdb.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pdb-gov