[PDB-tech] Change of ID's for Internet Exchanges

[Chris Malayter]

Perhaps we should keep our ID’s and have IX-F map theirs to ours?

-Chris

> On Jul 9, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Matt Griswold <grizz at 20c.com> wrote:
> 
> I haven't heard of any yet, but sure, we could do a mapping file, in fact it uses one to do it :)
> 
> On Jul 9, 2015 2:42 PM, "Arnold Nipper" <arnold.nipper at de-cix.net> wrote:
> On 08.07.2015 17:25, Matt Griswold wrote:
> > * Jeroen Valcke <jvalcke at opendns.com> [150706 18:25 +0200]:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> We're working on getting our in-house application compatible with the
> >>   new PeeringDB API.
> >> We've noticed that the id's for the Internet Exchanges seems to have
> >> changed. Is this intentional?
> >> This change seems weird, especially since other id's remain unchanged.
> >> Could we possible revert this and use the 'old' ID's?
> > It was intentional, part of the IXF db normalization. Is that breaking
> > something on your side?
> >
> 
> Of course it will break a lot of scripts. What about providing a mapping
> table?
> 
> 
> Arnold
> --
> Arnold Nipper
> CTO/COO and Co-Founder
> 
> DE-CIX Management GmbH | Lindleystrasse 12 | 60314 Frankfurt am Main |
> Germany | www.de-cix.net | Phone +49 69 1730902 22 |
> Mobile +49 172 2650958 | Fax +49 69 4056 2716 |
> arnold.nipper at de-cix.net | Geschaeftsfuehrer Harald A. Summa |
> Registergericht AG Koeln HRB 51135
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pdb-tech mailing list
> Pdb-tech at lists.peeringdb.com
> http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-tech