[PDB-tech] Feedback for PeeringDB 2.0 from AS37100

[Mark Tinka]

On 11/Jun/15 17:36, Koch, Andrew wrote:

> The separation of different contacts could be more clear in v2, but from what I see looking at several records in v2, including AS37100, all the contact details are there, just lumped together.
>
> Using AS37100 as example, I find two Technical and one Policy POC with only emails and one NOC with both email and phone on your v1 record.  In v2, the two technical are each listed on their own line in the Technical section, Policy has just the one entry and NOC has both the email and phone listed. https://beta.peeringdb.com/net/3900
>
> When I look at my record for AS4181, I see that the Technical contacts get jumbled making it unclear who the phone numbers relate to - https://beta.peeringdb.com/net/136, but all the contacts are present.

Indeed, you're right. All the contacts are there.

It is the presentation that made me miss that. So yes, that would need
to be fixed.

Again, I find the v1.0 representation simpler, even in this case.

Mark.