[PDB-tech] network facility data

[Ren Provo]

It is no longer useful.  Reclaim that space.
-ren
P.S. Please don't make adjustments this week <G>

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Matt Griswold <grizz at 20c.com> wrote:

> We're doing one final consistency check for API tags / fields / etc,
> and https://github.com/peeringdb/1to2/issues/29 came up, I'm in favor
> of removing.
>
> Without that, the only other information in that relation is local_asn,
> which I'm also not sure anyone uses, so we can probably just drop that
> whole table and link networks directly to facilities.
>
> Does anyone have a use case for keeping any of it?
> _______________________________________________
> Pdb-tech mailing list
> Pdb-tech at lists.peeringdb.com
> http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-tech
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/pdb-tech/attachments/20150915/77609afb/attachment.html>