[PDB-tech] network facility data

[Mark Tinka]

Agree.

Mark.

On 15/Sep/15 12:40, Ren Provo wrote:
> It is no longer useful.  Reclaim that space.
> -ren
> P.S. Please don't make adjustments this week <G>
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Matt Griswold <grizz at 20c.com
> <mailto:grizz at 20c.com>> wrote:
>
>     We're doing one final consistency check for API tags / fields / etc,
>     and https://github.com/peeringdb/1to2/issues/29 came up, I'm in favor
>     of removing.
>
>     Without that, the only other information in that relation is
>     local_asn,
>     which I'm also not sure anyone uses, so we can probably just drop that
>     whole table and link networks directly to facilities.
>
>     Does anyone have a use case for keeping any of it?
>     _______________________________________________
>     Pdb-tech mailing list
>     Pdb-tech at lists.peeringdb.com <mailto:Pdb-tech at lists.peeringdb.com>
>     http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-tech
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/pdb-tech/attachments/20150915/95232d56/attachment.html>