[PDB Tech] Using the API for integration into LibreNMS

[Neil Lathwood]

Didn't realise my original response went to Arnold (Apologies for the
offlist emails).

On 12 March 2017 at 21:35, Arnold Nipper <arnold at nipper.de> wrote:

> Imho netixlan is more appropriate as this endpoint holds all the
> relevant information needed for session setup.
>

Thanks for the response, that endpoint does look a lot more useful with the
exception of the peer name. The output gives the name of the IX itself:

            [78] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [id] => 32817
                    [net_id] => 976
                    [ix_id] => 583
                    [name] => IXManchester
                    [ixlan_id] => 583
                    [notes] =>
                    [speed] => 10000
                    [asn] => 20860
                    [ipaddr4] => 195.66.244.2
                    [ipaddr6] => 2001:7f8:4:2::517c:1
                    [is_rs_peer] => 1
                    [created] => 2017-01-26T18:25:22Z
                    [updated] => 2017-01-26T18:25:22Z
                    [status] => ok
                )

If it had the peers name then this would be the perfect call to use.

Thanks,

Neil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/pdb-tech/attachments/20170313/bb85d98c/attachment.html>