[PDB Data Ownership-TF] conditions for being listed in a facility

Arnold Nipper arnold at peeringdb.com
Wed Jan 8 02:30:12 PST 2020

[ Cutting down as the thread becomes too confusing ]

On 08.01.2020 01:05, Chris Caputo wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, Arnold Nipper wrote:
>> Last, but not least we should develop robust procedures in case
>> there is conflict.
> Arnold, I am trying to understand your perspective.  Do you think we
> need only document things and not actually make any decisions about
> data ownership?  The database schema and database relationships are a
> no brainer, while the complexity of what to do or what to present
> when there is a conflict, is why we are here.

IMO we need a document describing the records/fields in detail (incl.
perhaps where the information is coming from and who is the trusted source).

In case we are able to define a single ownership for a record/field,
fine. Otherwise we should define a robust procedure how to resolve

Arnold Nipper
email: arnold at peeringdb.com
mobile: +49 172 2650958

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/dataownership-tf/attachments/20200108/efa2d328/attachment.sig>

More information about the DataOwnership-TF mailing list