[PDB-gov] Voting eligibility
azuremesa at gmail.com
Wed Nov 18 14:48:54 PST 2015
Hum.. so an IIX w/o an ASN has a vested interest in peering? How does that
wrt "interested parties"...
Does this sound much different that stock classes & voting your "A" shares
differently than your "B" shares?
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2015, at 14:36 , bill manning <azuremesa at gmail.com> wrote:
> thought experiment:
> an entity has one or more ASNs assigned, either through an RIR or from
> private ASN space.
> Each ASN represents a unique Peering Policy (thats what ASNs do).
> Posit one vote per policy or vote per ASN.
> In the event that an entity has multiple ASNs/policies, all represented by
> the same natural person, it would seem prudent to restrict the natural
> person to a single vote, regardless of the number of ASNs they represent.
> Are you suggesting that instead of the natural/legal entity distinction,
> that a better way would be to have a single vote per registered entity
> regardless of the number of ASNs/policies registered in peeringDB?
> Think that might work.
> I think it’s more about not disenfranchising entities that do not have an
> ASN such as some IXs.
> I would also like to see us avoid disenfranchising participating and
> active individuals who are not
> representative of an ORG.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pdb-gov